Везде

RAS PresidiumИсследование Земли из космоса Earth Research from Space

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9614
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5405

SATELLITE LITHOSPHERIC MAGNETIC ANOMALIES OVER EASTERN ANATOLIA IN RELATION TO THE CONVERGENCE OF THE ARABIAN AND EURASIAN PLATES

You can
PII
S3034540525050017-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034540525050017
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
D. Yu. Abramova
  • Affiliation: Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences
L. M. Abramova
  • Affiliation: Geoelectromagnetic Research Centre, Shmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 5
Pages
3-16
Abstract
The image in the lithospheric magnetic anomaly field of the subduction process of the cold lithospheric Arabian Plate from the south under the Eurasian Plate, as well as the possible separation of a part of its lithosphere, is discussed. To analyze the influence of these processes over the Eastern Anatolian Plate (Turkey) territory, the CHAMP satellite experimental data were used. They were obtained mainly at the last stage of mission, when the orbit altitude dropped to 280–260 km, which made it possible to obtain geomagnetic parameters with a higher spatial resolution. Maps of lithospheric magnetic anomalies of various scales and of space averaging degree were constructed for several regions of the Eastern Anatolian Plate and its surroundings. A joint analysis of lithospheric magnetic anomaly and seismic velocity images, which were obtained as a result of extensive tomographic studies of the Arabian and East Anatolian Plates, was carried out. Obvious connections of the lithospheric magnetic anomalies field distribution with regional geological structures and tectonic processes that occurred here in the past, as well as those observed at present were revealed. The integrated use of satellite magnetic data, seismic surveys and tomographic methods provides a more complete understanding of the deep structure of the lithosphere in the seismically active region of Eastern Anatolia. The obtained results are of interest for further complex geological and geophysical studies and the construction of substantiated models of the lithosphere evolution.
Keywords
литосферные магнитные аномалии спутник Земли CHAMP Аравийская плита Восточно-Анатолийская плита завершение процесса субдукции плиты
Date of publication
21.03.2026
Year of publication
2026
Number of purchasers
0
Views
4

References

  1. 1. Абрамова Д.Ю., Абрамова Л.М., Варенцов И.М., Филиппов С.В. Анализ аномалий литосферного магнитного поля в рамках геолого-геофизического исследования корово-мантийных структур Карпато-Балканского региона // Геофизика. 2017. № 2. С. 71‒78.
  2. 2. Абрамова Д.Ю., Абрамова Л.М., Варенцов И.М., Филиппов С.В. Исследование литосферных магнитных аномалий Гренландско-Исландско-Фарерского вулканического комплекса по данным измерений на спутнике CHAMP // Геофизические исследования. 2019. Т. 20. № 2. С. 5–18. doi.org/10.21455/gr2019.2-1
  3. 3. Абрамова Д.Ю., Филиппов С.В, Абрамова Л.М. О возможностях использования спутниковых геомагнитных наблюдений в исследовании геолого-тектонического строения литосферы // Исслед. Земли из космоса. 2020. № 2. С. 69–81. doi.org/10.31857/S0205961420010029
  4. 4. Абрамова Л.М., Абрамова Д.Ю. Аномальное литосферное магнитное поле горячей точки Эфиопия/Афар (по данным миссии спутника CHAMP) // Исслед. Земли из космоса. 2022. № 5. С. 20‒29. DOI: 10.31857/S0205961422050025
  5. 5. Абрамова Д.Ю., Абрамова Л.М., Варенцов И.М. Аномальное литосферное магнитное поле над территорией Индо-Азиатской коллизии по данным спутника CHAMP // Исслед. Земли из космоса. 2022. № 3. С. 55–65.
  6. 6. Головков В.П., Зверева Т.И., Чернова Т.А. Метод создания пространственно-временной модели главного магнитного поля путем совместного использования методов сферического гармонического анализа и естественных ортогональных компонент // Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. 2007. T. 47. № 2. C. 272‒278.
  7. 7. Печерский Д.М., Геншафт Ю.С. Петромагнетизм континентальной литосферы и природа региональных магнитных аномалий: обзор // Российский журнал наук о Земле. ИФЗ РАН. 2001. Т. 3. № 2. C. 97‒124. DOI: 10.2205/2001ES000059
  8. 8. Arkani-Hamed J., Strangway D.W. Effective magnetic susceptibility of the oceanic upper mantle derived from MAGSAT data // Geophys. Res. Lett. 1986. 13(10). Р. 999–1002.
  9. 9. Aydin I., Karat H., Kocak A. Curie-point depth map of Turkey // Geophys. J. Int. 2005. V. 162. P. 633–640.
  10. 10. Biryol C.B., Beck S.L., Zandt G., Ozacar A.A. Segmented African lithosphere beneath the Anatolian region inferred from teleseismic P-wave tomography // Geophys. J. Int. 2011. V. 184. P. 1037–1057. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 246X.2010.04910.x
  11. 11. Elitok O., Dolmaz M.N. Mantle flow-induced crustal thinning in the area between the easternmost part of the Anatolian plate and the Arabian Foreland (E Turkey) deduced from the geological and geophysical data // Gondwana Res. 2008. V. 13. P. 302–318.
  12. 12. Faccenna C., Bellier O., Martinod J., Piromallo C., Regard V. Slab detachment beneath eastern Anatolia: a possible cause for the formation of the North Anatolian fault // Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 2006. V. 242. P. 85–97.
  13. 13. Gogus O.H., Pysklywec R.N. Mantle lithosphere delamination driving plateau uplift and synconvergent extension in eastern Anatolia // Geology. 2008. V. 36(9). P. 723–726. DOI: 10.1130/G24982A.1
  14. 14. Gvirtzman Z. Partial detachment of a lithospheric root under the southeast Carpathians: toward a better definition of the detachment concept // Geology. 2002. V. 30. P. 51–54.
  15. 15. Hemant K., Maus S., Haak V. Interpretation of CHAMP crustal field anomaly maps using a geographical information system (GIS) technique // Earth Observation with CHAMP: Results from Three Years in Orbit. 2005. P. 249–254.
  16. 16. Keskin M. Magma generation by slab steepening and breakoff beneath a subduction-accretion complex: an alternative model for collision related volcanism in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003. V. 30. 8046. DOI: 10.1029/2003GL018019
  17. 17. Lei J., Zhao D. Teleseismic evidence for a break-off subducting slab under Eastern Turkey // Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 2007. V. 257. P. 14–28.
  18. 18. Maggi A., Preistly K. Surface waveform tomography of the Turkish-Iranian plateau // Geophys. J. Int. 2005. V. 160. P. 1068–1080.
  19. 19. Ozacar A.A., Zandt G., Gilbert H., Beck S.L. Seismic images of crustal variations beneath the East Anatolian Plateau (Turkey) from teleseismic receiver functions // J. geol. Soc., Lond., Special Publications. 2010. V. 340. P. 485–496. DOI: 10.1144/SP34021
  20. 20. Piromallo C., Morell A. P-wave tomography of the mantle under the Alpine-Mediterranean area // J. Geophys. Res. 2003. V. 108. DOI: 10.1029/2002JB001757
  21. 21. Rauberg J., Rother M., Michaelis I. CH-ME-3-MAG - CHAMP 1 Hz Combined Magnetic Field Time Series (Level 3) // GFZ Data Services. 2019. doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.2.3.2019.004.
  22. 22. Reigber C., Lahr H., Schwintzer P. CHAMP mission status // Advances in Space Research. 2002. V. 30 (2). P. 129–134. doi.org/10.1016/S0273- 1177(02)00276- 4.
  23. 23. Reilinger R., McClusky S., Vermont P. GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions // J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 2006. 111(B5) 305411.
  24. 24. Robertson A.H.F., Dixon J.E. Introduction: aspects of the geological evolution of the eastern Mediterranean, in The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean // J. Geol. Soc., London, Special Publication, eds Dixon, J.E., Robertson, A.H.F. 1984. V. 17. P. 1–74.
  25. 25. Senger A.M.C., Ozeren S., Genc T., Zor E. 2003. East Anatolian high plateau as a mantle-supported, N-S shortened domain structure // Geophys. Res. Lett. V. 30. 8044. DOI: 10.1029/2003GL017858
  26. 26. Stephen J.V., Morton A.C., Carter A., Gibbs S., Barabadze T.G. Oligocene uplift of the Western Greater Caucasus: an effect of initial Arabia-Eurasia collision // Terra Nova. 2007. V. 19. P. 16–166.
  27. 27. Tanaka A., Okubo Y., Matsubayashi O. Curie point depth based on spectrum analysis of the magnetic anomaly data in East and Southeast Asia // Tectonophysics. 1999. 306 (3- 4). P. 461–470.
  28. 28. Turkoglu E., Unsworth M., Caglar I., Tuncer V., Ümit Avsar U. Lithospheric structure of the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone in eastern Anatolia: Magnetotelluric evidence for widespread weakening by fluids? // Geology. 2008. V. 36. № 8. P. 619–622. DOI: 10.1130/G24683A.1
  29. 29. Wessel P., Smith W.H.F. The generic mapping tools // Technical reference and cookbook version 4.2. 2007. doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426
  30. 30. Wortel R., Spakman W. Subduction and slab detachment in the Mediterranean-Carpathian region // Science. 2000. V. 290. P. 1910–1917.
  31. 31. Zor E. Tomographic evidence of slab detachment beneath eastern Turkey and the Caucasus // Geophys. J. Int. 2008. V. 175. P. 1273–1282. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 246X.2008.03946. x
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library