RAS PresidiumИсследование Земли из космоса Earth Research from Space

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9614
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5405

Comparison of the images of hot spots and mantle plumes of various types in the lithospheric magnetic anomalies field

PII
S30345405S0205961425020049-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034540525020049
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 2
Pages
48-60
Abstract
The spatial distribution of the lithospheric magnetic anomalies Maps of the spatial distribution of the lithospheric magnetic anomaly field for three hot spot areas: Hawaii, Afar and Iceland were analyzed in order to solve the interdisciplinary problem of the hot spots and mantle plumes impact on the lithosphere. To construct the plume and hot spot magnetic images the experimental data of the CHAMP satellite was used which were obtained in the last year of its operation, 2010, at a minimum level of 280-260 km. The database of the anomalous magnetic field parameters has been supplemented for areas where materials on these hot spots were already available, and new data has been obtained for the part of the Pacific Ocean where the Hawaiian hotspot is located. Maps of lithospheric magnetic anomalies have been constructed for the central Pacific Ocean, the East African rift zone and the North Atlantic. It is shown that magnetic images of the various types of hotspots: oceanic Hawaiian, continental Ethiopian and island Icelandic appear themselves in different ways, which reflect the consequences of tectonic processes that took place earlier and are currently developing in the territories under consideration. It is shown that the use of satellite observations of the lithospheric magnetic field in areas with mantle plume activity when being combined with other geological and geophysical regional data could add considerable information to the overall picture of the tectonic processes study.
Keywords
литосферные магнитные аномалии геомагнитные данные спутник CHAMP мантийные плюмы горячие точки Гавайи Афар Исландия
Date of publication
01.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
68

References

  1. 1. Абрамова Д.Ю., Абрамова Л.М., Филиппов С.В. Корреляция литосферных магнитных аномалий и тектонических структур в норвежско-гренландской части Арктики // Геодинамика и тектонофизика. 2018. Т. 9. № 4. С. 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2018-9-4-0388
  2. 2. Добpецов Н.Л. Геологические следствия термохимической модели плюмов // Геология и геофизика. 2008. Т. 49. № 7. C. 587‒604.
  3. 3. Головков В.П., Зверева Т.И., Чернова Т.А. Метод создания пространственно-временной модели главного магнитного поля путем совместного использования методов сферического гармонического анализа и естественных ортогональных компонент // Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. 2007. T. 47. № 2. C. 272‒278.
  4. 4. Яковлев А.В., Бушенкова Н.А., Кулаков И.Ю., Добрецов Н.Л. Структура верхней мантии Арктического региона по данным региональной сейсмотомографии // Геология и геофизика. 2012. Т. 53. № 10. С. 1261–1272.
  5. 5. Abramova D.Yu., Abramova L.M. Lithospheric magnetic anomalies in the territory of Siberia (from measurements by the CHAMP satellite) // Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2014. V. 55. № 7. P. 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2014.06.005
  6. 6. Abramova D.Yu., Filippov S.V, Abramova L.M. Possible Use of Satellite Geomagnetic Observations in Geological and Tectonic Studies of Lithosphere Structure // Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. 2020. V. 56. № 12. Р. 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433820120324
  7. 7. Abramova L.M., Varentsov I.M., Abramova D.Yu. Image of Mantle Plume Processes in the Satellite Magnetic Field over Africa // Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. 2023. V. 59. № 9. Р. 1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433823090025
  8. 8. Allen R., Nolet G., Morgan W., Vogfjord K., Nettles M., Ekstrom G., Bergsson B., Erlendsson P., Foulger G., Jakobsdóttir S., Julian B., Pritchard M., Ragnarsson S., Stefánsson R. Plume driven plumbing and crustal formation in Iceland // J. Geophys. Res. 2002. V. 107. № B8. P. ESE 4-1-ESE 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000584
  9. 9. Bastow I., Nyblade A., Stuar, G., Rooney T., Benoit M. Upper mantle seismic structure beneath the Ethiopian hot spot: Rifting at the edge of the African low-velocity anomaly // Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2008. V 9. № 12. https://doi:10.1029/2008GC002107
  10. 10. Benoit M., Nyblade A., VanDecar J. Uppermantle P-wave speed variations beneath Ethiopia and the origin of the Afar hotspot // Geology. 2006. V. 34. P. 329–332. https://doi.org/10.1130/G22281.1
  11. 11. Bijwaard H., Spakman W. Tomographic evidence for a whole-mantle plume below Iceland // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1999. V. 166. P. 121‒126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X (99)00004-7
  12. 12. Darbyshire F., White R., Priestley K. Structure of the crust and uppermost mantle of Iceland from a combined seismic and gravity study // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2000. 181. P. 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X (00)00206-5
  13. 13. Davies G.F. Ocean bathymetry and mantle convection: 1. Large-scale flow and hotspots // J. Geophys. Res. 1988. V. 93. P. 10467–10480. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB093iB09p10467
  14. 14. Forte A., Qu´er´e S., Moucha R., Simmons N., Grand S., Mitrovica J., Rowley D. Joint seismic-geodynamic-mineral physical modeling of African geodynamics: a reconciliation of deep-mantle convection with surface geophysical constraints // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010. V. 295. P. 329‒341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.03.017
  15. 15. Fouch M., James D., Van Decar J., Van der Lee S., and the Kaapvaal Seismic Group. Mantle seismic structure beneath the Kaapvaal and Zimbabwe cratons, // South Afr. J. Geol. 2004. V. 107. P. 33‒44. https://doi.org/10.2113/107.1-2.33
  16. 16. Foulger G., Anderson D. A cool model for the Iceland hotspot // Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 2005. V. 141. P. 1‒22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.10.007
  17. 17. Hansen S., Nyblade A., Benoit M. Mantle structure beneath Africa and Arabia from adaptively parameterized P-wave tomography: Implications for the origin of Cenozoic Afro-Arabian tectonism // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2012. V. 319–320. P. 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.023
  18. 18. Hansen S., Nyblade A. The deep seismic structure of the Ethiopia/Afar hotspot and the African superplume // Geophys. J. Int. 2013. V. 194. P. 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt116
  19. 19. Hjartarson Á., Erlendsson Ö., Blischke A. The Greenland–Iceland–Faroe Ridge Complex. In: G. Péron-Pinvidic, J.R. Hopper, T. Funck, M.S. Stoker, C. Gaina, J.C. Doornenbal, U.E. Árting (Eds.) The NE Atlantic Region: a reappraisal of crustal structure, tectonostratigraphy and magmatic evolution / Geological Society. London. Special Publications. 2017. V. 447. P. 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP447.14
  20. 20. Lei J., Zhao D. A new insight into the Hawaiian plume // Earth and Planetary Sci. Lett. 2006. V. 241. P. 438‒453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.038
  21. 21. Li X., Kind R., Priestley K., Sobolev S., Tilmann F. Mapping the Hawaiian0 plume conduit with converted seismic waves // Nature. 2000. V. 405. P. 938–941. https://doi.org/10.1038/35016054
  22. 22. Loper D.E. Mantle plumes // Tectonophysics. 1991. V. 187. P. 373‒384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951 (91)90476-9
  23. 23. Maruyama Sh. Plume tectonics // Geol. Soc. Japan. 1994. V. 100. (1). P. 24‒34. https://doi.org/10.5575/geosoc.100.24
  24. 24. Montelli R., Nolet G., Dahlen F.A., Masters G. A catalogue of deep mantle plumes: New results from finite-frequency tomography // Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2006. V. 7. Q11007. https://doi:10.1029/2006GC001248
  25. 25. Morgan W. Convection plumes in the lower mantle // Nature. 1971. V. 230. P. 42–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/230042a0
  26. 26. Nataf H. Seismic imaging of mantle plumes // Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2000. V. 28. P. 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.391
  27. 27. Pirajno F. Ore deposits and mantle plumes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. 556 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2502-6
  28. 28. Reigber C., Lühr H., Schwintzer P. CHAMP mission status // Advances in Space Research. 2002. V. 30. № 2. P. 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177 (02)00276-4
  29. 29. Rickers F., Fichtner A., Trampert J. The Iceland–Jan Mayen plume system and its impaction mantle dynamics in the North Atlantic region: Evidence from full-waveform inversion // Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 2013. V. 367. P. 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.02.022
  30. 30. Ritsema J., Allen R. The elusive mantle plume // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2003. V. 207. P. 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X (02)01093-2
  31. 31. Ritsema J., van Heijst H., Woodhouse J. Complex shear wave velocity structure beneath Africa and Iceland // Science. 1999. V. 286. P. 1925‒1928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5446.1925
  32. 32. Simmons N., Forte A., Grand S. Thermochemical structure and dynamics of the African superplume // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007. V. 34. https://doi:10.1029/2006GL028009
  33. 33. Sleep N.H. Hotspots and mantle plumes: some phenomenology // J. Geophys. Res. 1990. V. 95. P. 6715–6736. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB05p06715
  34. 34. Wessel P., Smit W.H.F. The generic mapping tools /Technical reference and cookbook version 4.2. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426
  35. 35. Wilson J. A possible origin of the Hawaiian icelands // Canadian Journal of Physics. 1963. V. 41. P. 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1139/p63-094
  36. 36. Wolfe C.J., Bjarnason I.T., Van Decar J.C., Solomon S.C. Seismic structure of the Iceland mantle plume // Nature. 1997. 385. P. 245‒247. https://doi.org/10.1038/385245a0
  37. 37. Wolfe C., Solomon S., Silver P., Van Decar J., Russo R. Inversion of body-wave delay times for mantle structure beneath the Hawaiian islands: results from the PELENET experiment // Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 2002. V. 198. P. 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X (02)00493-4
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library